Secret Recordings in Family Litigation - Zukerman Law

A Guide to Secret Recordings in Family Law

Family disputes are inherently stressful, often leaving people feeling unheard and desperate for a clear path forward. In the heat of the moment, some individuals may consider secretly recording conversations to gather evidence for their case. While the desire to document everything might seem logical, the legality and effectiveness of secret recordings in family law are surprisingly complex.

This blog post will delve into the legalities of using secret recordings in family litigation. Professional family law attorneys in Zukerman Law Group understand the intricacies of these situations and can help you navigate the legalities of evidence gathering to build a strong case.


Secret Recordings

Thanks to technological improvements, recording conversations is now simpler than ever. You can even record your ongoing phone conversations with a single button press. But if you don’t say at the beginning of the conversation that “I’m recording this conversation,” you’re probably secretly recording.

Any audio or video recording that includes the following is a secret conversation recording:

  • The other person hasn’t specifically consented to being recorded.
  • There is no implied consent to being recorded.

While placing security cameras on your property is an example of implied consent, making sure your spouse or ex-partner witnesses you putting your phone in your back pocket is not. 

Essentially, you’d need sufficient reason to believe that your ex-partner is aware they’re being recorded for implied consent to be assumed.


The Legal Use of Secret Recordings in Court Proceedings

The admissibility of secret recordings in family law court proceedings is a complex issue. It hinges on several key considerations:

  • To be admitted as evidence, the recording must be relevant to the issues at trial.
  • The parties recorded must be identifiable.
  • The recording must remain trustworthy and unaltered.

However, it is usually discouraged to use secret recordings in family law cases. These recordings have the potential to damage relationships within the family, increase conflict, and damage the restructuring of family relationships.

Also, secret recordings could not be given much weight in court. Their admissibility does not ensure a favorable decision, and the court frequently considers total parenting plans rather than particular incidents. It is essential to seek professional legal advice before resorting to secret recordings in high-conflict family law cases.

Adverse Impact on Family Relationships

Secret recordings in family law proceedings can have significant legal implications but also hurt family relationships. They can create a toxic environment of distrust and suspicion, exacerbated by the tense interpersonal dynamics during litigation. 

Parents who use secret recordings often prioritize their legal strategies over their children’s emotional well-being, which can be detrimental to children who may feel caught in their parents’ disputes. 

The courts in British Columbia generally disapprove of such practices, emphasizing the importance of maintaining trust, respect, and open communication within the family unit. Therefore, parents should consider the potential damage to their family dynamics before using secret recordings as evidence in family law proceedings.


Recording Conversations Legalities

It is necessary to have a clear understanding of the relevant laws and the possible implications in order to navigate the legalities of recording conversations in a family law setting. In British Columbia, recording private conversations usually only requires the consent of one party. 

This indicates that you can legally record conversations without the other person’s consent. However, it is illegal to record conversations that you are not a part of, or where no party consents to being recorded.

The admissibility of secret recordings in court is determined by a four-step test: relevance to the trial, known identities of recorded parties, trustworthiness, and evidentiary value. 

Even in cases where these recordings are relevant, courts do have some discretion in deciding whether to exclude them. This discretion is, however, limited.

Even if the court admits a recording as evidence, a judge can still comment on the weight that should be given to the recording as evidence, or in other words, how much consideration should be given. 

Additionally, courts have been known to discourage the use of secret recordings on numerous occasions.


Children’s Involvement in Litigation

The involvement of children in high-conflict family law cases is a contentious issue. It’s generally discouraged, as it can escalate tension and impact the child’s well-being. 

Courts often view secret recordings featuring children unfavorably, as they can be seen as evidence of a parent prioritizing their self-interest over the child’s welfare. 

The use of children’s words as ammunition in legal battles is considered unconscionable, and they should be respected and kept private, not treated as foot soldiers in their parents’ disputes.

The legal standard for recording children’s conversations is whether the probative value outweighs potential prejudicial effects. Courts prioritize protecting children from litigation stress and harm. 

However, recordings may not always have high probative value, especially in questionable contexts. Therefore, parents should consider involving their children in litigation and seek legal advice before recording conversations involving them.


When Can Recordings Be Helpful?

While secret recordings can be a tempting option, their usefulness depends heavily on the specific content and legal context. Here are some situations where recordings might be beneficial:

Documenting Threats

If your ex-partner is making verbal threats of violence, harassment, or harm to you or your children, a recording can be powerful evidence to support your claims for restraining orders or adjustments to custody arrangements.

Financial Admissions

In situations where finances are a major point of contention, a recording that captures your ex-partner admitting to hidden assets, income, or debts can be valuable for equitable property division or child support calculations.

Breaching Custody Agreements

If your ex-partner is consistently violating court-ordered custody agreements, a recording of them admitting  to missed visits or inappropriate behavior during visitation can strengthen your case for modifications to the agreement.

Demonstrating Unfitness

In rare cases, a recording that captures your ex-partner exhibiting abusive or neglectful behavior towards the children can be crucial evidence for proving their unfitness as a parent.

It’s important to remember that these are just examples, and the legal weight of a recording will depend on various factors. Consulting with an experienced family law attorney like those at Zukerman Law Group is vital to understand the specific laws in your jurisdiction and determine if your recording is admissible in court. They can also advise on the best way to present the recording and ensure it strengthens your case.

Contact Zukerman Law Group for a free consultation to discuss the specifics of your situation.


Family law matters are inherently complex, and the legalities surrounding secret recordings add another layer of confusion. For a strong understanding of how secret recordings might apply to your specific situation, contacting a professional family law attorney is crucial.

At Zukerman Law Group, our team of experienced family law professionals can help you navigate the legalities of evidence gathering and build a strong case.


  • 1- Are secret recordings admissible in court in the USA?1

    States like California, Illinois, Florida, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, Michigan, and Montana require consent from all parties before allowing for taping. Otherwise, it is illegal and not admissible in court.

  • 2- Can you use a secret recording?1

    Recording conversations and activities without the consent of all parties is generally illegal in many jurisdictions due to privacy and confidentiality concerns, but there are exceptions to this rule.

There were no results that matched your search.

Stuart Zukerman

Stuart Zukerman, a graduate of the University of British Columbia, has over 32 years of experience in litigation with a focus on Family Law, Personal Injury, Wrongful Dismissal claims, and Collaborative Divorce & Mediation. He has extensive trial experience in divorce, child custody, spousal support, asset division, and ICBC injury claims. As an accredited Family Law Mediator, he helps resolve disputes without court intervention. Stuart has also authored papers on family law and lectured at CLE courses.